Automation and Workflows
7 MINUTE READ
APR 2026
Automation used to mean a bot doing a repetitive task. That is not what it means anymore.

IBM's 2026 research on AI trends is clear about the shift: we have moved from automation that waits for a human to trigger it, to automation that pursues a goal on its own. IBM calls this the Agentic Pivot. And the scale of what is coming is significant. Agentic AI workflows are predicted to increase eightfold by the end of 2026. What that means practically is that a single business objective, say, processing a supplier invoice, can now be handled by a coordinated set of specialized agents: one checking procurement records, one verifying legal terms, one updating logistics. No human in the loop for the routine steps. But here is the thing that matters for C-suite executives: the organizations building these workflows now are not doing it because the technology is impressive. They are doing it because 72% of leaders now require a 25% ROI improvement on their IT portfolio, and automated workflow integration is one of the clearest paths to that number.

8x

Predicted increase in agentic AI workflows by end of 2026, per IBM IBV. Automation has moved from triggered by humans to goal-driven and autonomous.

94%

Of core banking modernization projects exceed their timelines due to legacy code that creates workflow bottlenecks. IBM's Zero Copy Integration approach addresses this directly.

40%

Of manufacturers are now using AI to automate production scheduling, per IBM 2026. Autonomous predictive maintenance is detecting wear in factory robotics and rescheduling production lines in real time.

10x

Increase in marketer efficiency in IBM media pilots, where AI manages thousands of micro-segments simultaneously rather than requiring manual campaign management for each.

The gap between front office and back office is where most workflow value gets lost.IBM's State of Salesforce research with IDC identifies a specific problem that most organizations with CRM platforms recognize immediately: the sales team closes a deal, and then manual handoffs to billing, inventory, and fulfillment introduce delays, errors, and customer experience problems. The fix is not a better CRM. It is connecting the front office to the back office through automated workflows that eliminate the manual steps in between. IBM, named a leader in the IDC MarketScape for Salesforce implementation, frames this as one of three pillars for automation ROI: platform-native AI, custom workflow connections between systems, and measurable returns. C-suite executives who have approved CRM investments but not the integration work sitting underneath them have solved half the problem.
What automation looks like in practice across the industries where it is moving fastest
Automation is not a generic capability. What it looks like in banking is completely different from what it looks like in energy or manufacturing. Here is what IBM's 2026 industry research shows about where agentic workflows are actually being deployed and what they are doing.

Banking: Moving data without moving it, and settling transactions without paperwork

94% of core banking modernization projects exceed their timelines because legacy systems are deeply entangled. IBM's response to this is Zero Copy Integration: instead of extracting data from mainframes and cloud systems to process it elsewhere, AI agents operate directly on the data where it already lives. This eliminates a category of workflow complexity that has caused delays and errors for decades. And 57% of banking executives say tokenization will allow AI agents to settle transactions autonomously, removing the manual back-office steps that currently sit between a transaction and its completion. C-suite executives in financial services need to ask whether their current workflow architecture requires humans to move data between systems, and whether that step is actually necessary.

Energy and utilities: AI that does not just alert, it acts

IBM's Grid Edge automation work in energy illustrates something important about what makes agentic automation different from older automation. When an AI agent monitoring IoT sensors detects a potential thermal failure in grid infrastructure, it does not send an alert and wait. It autonomously triggers a work order, checks parts inventory, and suggests power rerouting to prevent a blackout. The human receives a summary of what was done and what was recommended, not a notification that something needs attention. C-suite executives in energy and utilities who are still running operations where an alert goes to a person who then manually initiates each of those steps are running a slower and more error-prone version of a workflow that can now be largely automated.

Automotive and manufacturing: Production scheduling and predictive maintenance without manual intervention

40% of manufacturers are now using AI to automate production scheduling, per IBM's 2026 research. And autonomous predictive maintenance has changed how factory floor operations are managed. Agents detect wear patterns in robotics, pause specific production lines that need attention, and reschedule other lines to maintain total output while maintenance happens. The manual version of this process requires a maintenance engineer to notice a problem, escalate it, coordinate with production planning, and manually reschedule. The automated version happens faster, with less disruption, and without requiring a person to be in the right place at the right time. C-suite executives in manufacturing should be asking which of their current manual coordination steps exist only because the systems involved do not talk to each other.

Telecoms and media: Intent-based network management and hyper-personalized content at scale

In telecommunications, IBM's automation work has moved toward intent-based network management. A human defines the goal, something like prioritize emergency services bandwidth during a major incident, and the AI orchestrates the network configuration in real time without requiring manual technical steps. In media, IBM pilots have shown a tenfold increase in marketer efficiency by using AI to manage thousands of micro-segments simultaneously. A marketing team that previously managed broad campaign segments manually can now run highly specific targeting at a scale that was not operationally feasible before. C-suite executives in media and telco need to distinguish between automation that makes existing workflows faster and automation that enables entirely new operational models.

At Marchcroft

Innovating Today,
Shaping Tomorrow

At Marchcroft, we don't just meet expectations - we exceed them.

7 in 10

Leading operations using predictive analytics as an automation input

Seven in ten pioneering utilities use predictive analytics to manage supply and demand. Predictive analytics is what gives automation its timing. When an AI agent knows that a demand spike is coming, it can trigger procurement, staffing, or production workflows in advance rather than reacting after the fact. Self-optimization at scale requires the analytical layer to be feeding the automation layer continuously.

67%

Managing distributed operations as coordinated automated systems

67% of optimizing utilities manage microgrids as both local services and grid-wide assets. This is the same architectural principle behind multi-agent orchestration. Specialized agents handling procurement, legal, logistics, and inventory can each operate on their own domain while a coordinating layer manages them toward a shared business objective. The organizations that have built this kind of distributed coordination are completing complex workflows faster than those still routing tasks through human handoffs.

~65%

Using simulation to guide where automation investment delivers the most value

Nearly two-thirds of utilities create asset failure forecasts to evaluate network impact before investing in solutions. Applied to workflow automation, this means modeling which processes will deliver the highest ROI when automated before committing resources. C-suite executives who identify the highest-volume, highest-friction manual workflows in their operations and model the impact of automating them make better investment decisions than those automating whatever is easiest to automate.

01. Identify which workflows are actually costing you the most before you automate anything

The most common mistake in automation projects is starting with what is technically easiest to automate rather than what is operationally most expensive to run manually. C-suite executives should ask their operations and finance teams for a clear picture of where manual workflow steps are creating the most cost: through delays, errors, headcount, or customer experience failures. The workflows that show up at the top of that list are the ones where automation ROI is easiest to demonstrate. IBM's research finding that 72% of leaders now require a 25% ROI improvement on their IT portfolio means that automation investments need to be justified against specific cost and efficiency baselines, not general productivity improvements.

02. Decide whether you need workflow automation, agentic automation, or both

These are different things and they require different approaches. Workflow automation connects systems and automates defined steps in a known process. If a contract is signed, trigger the billing system and update the CRM. That is well understood and relatively straightforward to implement. Agentic automation is different. An agent is given a goal and figures out the steps needed to achieve it, coordinating with other agents and systems along the way. IBM's watsonx Orchestrate is built for this: it uses natural language to allow non-technical employees to build complex multi-agent workflows without writing code. C-suite executives need to be clear about which category their automation priorities fall into because the implementation complexity, the governance requirements, and the oversight model are different for each.

03. Build the integration layer before you build the automation layer

Most automation failures are not automation failures. They are integration failures. An agent or a workflow cannot complete a task if it cannot access the systems and data it needs to work with. IBM's Zero Copy Integration approach in banking solves this at the data layer by allowing agents to work directly on data where it lives rather than requiring it to be extracted and moved to a separate processing environment. C-suite executives who have approved automation budgets but not integration budgets are building systems that will spend most of their time waiting for data access. The two investments must happen together.

04. Implement Agentic Governance to manage autonomous decision-making

As automation becomes agentic, it moves from following instructions to making decisions. This introduces a new category of risk. How do you know an agent is following your legal and compliance policies? How do you audit a workflow that was orchestrated dynamically by AI rather than defined as a fixed process? IBM's AI Governance frameworks address this by building policy guardrails directly into the agentic mesh. C-suite executives need to ensure that as they move toward autonomous workflows, their governance model evolves from 'did the person follow the process' to 'is the agent operating within the defined policy constraints'. Self-optimization without oversight is not scalability; it is exposure.

Get Access To Audit Sheet

Unlock valuable insights with our complimentary audit sheet. Streamline your processes, identify areas for improvement, and boost efficiency—all at no cost.

Download Audit Sheet
Questions C-suite executives ask us about automation and workflows
These are the conversations that come up most often when leadership teams are moving from simple task automation toward complex, goal-driven agentic workflows.

Q: We have invested heavily in automation but the ROI is not yet appearing on the bottom line. Why?

This usually happens for one of two reasons. First, the organization has automated 'around' the problem rather than through it, for example, automating a task within a silo while the handoff between silos remains manual and slow. IBM's research with IDC on Salesforce implementation highlights this specific issue as the 'Front-Office/Back-Office Gap'. Second, the automation was built as a series of triggered bots that require constant human monitoring and intervention. The shift toward Agentic AI (the 'Agentic Pivot') is specifically intended to solve this: by giving agents business goals rather than just task triggers, they can handle the variations and exceptions that previously required a human to jump back in. ROI at scale requires moving beyond task automation toward end-to-end workflow orchestration.

Q: What is the real difference between a 'Bot' and an 'Agent' in these workflows?

A Bot is reactive: it waits for a specific trigger and follows a pre-defined script. If anything in the environment changes, the bot fails and waits for a human to fix it. An Agent is proactive: it is given a business objective (e.g., 'Verify the compliance of this supplier invoice and prepare it for payment') and it uses reasoning to achieve that goal. It coordinates with other agents, searches for missing information, and handles exceptions based on policy guardrails. IBM IBV predicts an eightfold increase in these agentic workflows by end of 2026 because they are far more resilient and scalable than traditional bots. For C-suite executives, the practical difference is that Agents require less human oversight for the same complexity of work.

Q: How do we bridge the gap between our modern front-office and our legacy back-office systems?

Legacy mainframes and core systems are often the bottleneck in modern workflows. The traditional solution, full replacement, is slow, expensive, and risky. The modern approach, which IBM calls Zero Copy Integration, is to use AI layers that can interact with legacy data directly without requiring it to be copied or moved. This allows you to build modern automated workflows on top of legacy infrastructure without waiting for a full-scale systems overhaul. 94% of core banking transformation projects exceed their timelines specifically because of legacy integration issues; bypassing the 'copy and move' requirement is how you get to ROI faster while still utilizing your existing high-uptime back-office systems.

Latest Blogs

Marchcroft Editorial - 2026-03-28

The Agentic Pivot: Why 2026 Is the Year Automation Becomes Goal-Driven

Agentic AI

Automation

Workflows

Marchcroft Editorial - 2026-03-15

Zero Copy Integration: Solving the Legacy Core Bottleneck in Banking

Banking

Integration

Modernization

Marchcroft Editorial - 2026-02-20

Bridging the Front-Office/Back-Office Gap with Automated Workflows

Salesforce

Workflows

ROI

View more

Want to understand where your manual handoffs are actually costing you the most?

Here is what working with us on automation and workflows looks like.

Ready to Get Started?
Let's discuss how we can help your organization pivot toward agentic workflows and realize measurable ROI from your automation investments.
Consult with us

Get In Touch

+44 20 3286 8065

contactus@marchcroft.com